Al-hakim Al-mustadrak Vol. 4 P. 398 May 2026

When using the keyword "al-hakim al-mustadrak vol. 4 p. 398" in academic writing, follow this best practice:

Never separate al-Hakim’s text from al-Dhahabi’s marginal notes—they are two halves of a single critical edition.

Narration Chain (Isnad): Al-Hakim records via a chain from ‘Amr ibn Dinar, from Ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him), who said:

"The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: 'Whoever wants to look at Adam in his knowledge, Noah in his understanding, Abraham in his forbearance, and Moses in his intensity and John son of Zachariah in his worship, and Jesus in his asceticism, then let him look at ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib.'" al-hakim al-mustadrak vol. 4 p. 398

Or in another narration on the same page:

"I am the city of knowledge, and ‘Ali is its gate. So whoever wants knowledge, let him come to the gate."

Al-Hakim then comments at the foot of the page: "This hadith is authentic (Sahih) according to the conditions of Imam al-Bukhari and Imam Muslim, though they did not record it." When using the keyword "al-hakim al-mustadrak vol

The reference Al-Mustadrak vol. 4, p. 398 is not random. It is a battleground for three intersecting scholarly disciplines:

Why does this matter for the average Muslim or student of knowledge? Because Al-Mustadrak vol. 4, p. 398 teaches us a critical lesson: The authentication of a hadith is not monolithic. Imam al-Hakim, with his encyclopedic mind, said "sahih." Imam al-Dhahabi, his student’s student, said "da‘if." And Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, in Talkhis al-Habir, tilted toward the latter.

This does not "cancel" the Muhaddithun; rather, it shows the depth of ijtihad (independent reasoning). The page reminds us that: "The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him)

Al-Hakim al-Mustadrak vol. 4, p. 398 is more than a bibliographic entry. It is a living case study in Islamic jurisprudence of hadith. Whether you are a Sunni, Shi‘i, or academic Orientalist, this page represents a crossroads: where history, theology, and rigorous textual criticism meet. The next time you encounter someone citing this reference, you will know not just what it says, but why it matters—and why the ink of the scholars is indeed holier than the blood of martyrs.

Further Reading Recommendations: