| Pros | Cons | | :--- | :--- | | Durability: Built to withstand daily, heavy usage in busy clinics. | Weight: Heavy to move once assembled (approx. 60-70kg). Not portable. | | Ergonomics: Electric height saves the therapist's back. | Legrest: On the standard 171 H, the leg section is often fixed (not adjustable) or requires manual resetting. | | Value: More affordable than 2 or 3-motor electric tables while keeping the essential electric height feature. | Backrest: Manual adjustment requires the therapist to physically move the section; less "smooth" than a fully electric version. | | Patient Access: Low minimum height makes it accessible for mobility-impaired patients. | |
| Application | Why useful | |-------------|-------------| | Topographic surveys | Fast height changes without tools. | | Stakeout | Stable, lightweight for one-person operation. | | Detail point collection | Maintains verticality with a bubble level. | covadis 171h top
Unlike fully electric tables (which are more expensive), the 171 H utilizes a manual gas-spring mechanism for the backrest. | Pros | Cons | | :--- |
Large farms spanning hundreds of hectares require pivot systems that demand 800 to 1,500 GPM at 60 to 80 PSI. The Covadis 171H Top delivers this volume while drawing from aquifers as deep as 200 meters. Its high efficiency (often >78%) directly reduces diesel or electricity costs per ton of crop harvested. | Application | Why useful | |-------------|-------------| |