Streaming Access
Unfortunately, this film is not available for streaming yet.
As soon as it will be available for streaming, it will appear in your university streaming page.

In The Nature of Human Values, Rokeach analyzed data from thousands of surveys. His major findings included:

  • Political Ideology:
  • Why this 1973 book still defines how we measure what matters.

    If you have ever typed the search query "Rokeach M 1973 The Nature of Human Values PDF top" into a search engine, you are likely a student, researcher, or behavioral scientist looking for a definitive source on value theory. You aren't just looking for a file; you are looking for the theoretical backbone of modern social psychology.

    Published over half a century ago, Milton Rokeach’s The Nature of Human Values remains one of the most cited works in the history of psychology and sociology. But why does a PDF from 1973 generate such consistent search traffic today? Because Rokeach solved a problem that still plagues social science: How do you measure the invisible architecture of a human life?

    This article explores the genius of Rokeach’s model, why the original text is a "top" resource, and how you can ethically access and apply its wisdom.


    These refer to desirable end-states of existence. These are the goals a person strives to achieve during their lifetime.

    Rokeach argued that because values are few in number and central to the self-concept, they are generally stable over time. However, they are not immutable. The book outlines a theory of value change, suggesting that values shift when an individual becomes aware of a contradiction between their self-concept and their behavior, or between their values and reality.

    This concept—known as value-confrontation—suggests that simply providing people with information about their own value inconsistencies can trigger lasting behavioral change. This insight has had profound implications for therapy, education, and organizational change.

    | Concept | Definition | Relationship to Values | |---------|------------|------------------------| | Value | Trans-situational belief about desirable end-states or behaviors | Central, fewer in number | | Attitude | Belief organized around a specific object or situation | Attitude is an expression of one or more values | | Social ideology | System of beliefs shared by a group | Reflects shared value priorities |

    Rokeach famously stated: “An attitude is an organization of several beliefs around a specific object or situation, whereas a value is a single belief of a very specific kind.”

    In the landscape of social psychology, few works have managed to bridge the gap between abstract philosophy and empirical science as effectively as Milton Rokeach’s 1973 masterpiece, The Nature of Human Values. While philosophers had debated the concept of "the good" for millennia, Rokeach attempted something radically different: he sought to measure values, categorize them, and demonstrate how they predict human behavior.

    Nearly half a century later, Rokeach’s Value Survey remains a foundational tool for understanding why we make the choices we make, from the ballot box to the grocery aisle.

    Have you used the Rokeach Value Survey in your work? Share your experiences in the comments or connect with us for the official discussion guide on value-based decision making.

    The RVS is a rank-order instrument (not Likert scale). Respondents receive two lists of 18 values:

    The forced-choice ranking reduces response biases (e.g., social desirability, acquiescence) but may create a lack of independence between values.

    This Week’s Featured Films