Midway through, the initial power dynamic (one character appears dominant, the other submissive) flips entirely. The catalyst for this change is a single line of whispered dialogue that recontextualizes everything that happened before. It’s a narrative twist rarely seen in this category.
| Property | Value |
|----------|-------|
| Error Code | SSIS‑835 (also appears as 0xC0202009 in the log) |
| Message (most common) | The OLE DB provider "Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0" reported an error. The provider may not be correctly installed. (0x80004005) |
| Component | OLE DB Source / OLE DB Destination (usually using the ACE provider) |
| Typical Environment | SSIS 2016‑2022, Azure‑SSISIR, or SSIS Catalog (SSISDB) running on a 64‑bit SQL Server instance. |
| Symptoms | Package fails at the Data Flow step, logging shows Error: 0xC0202009 at Data Flow Task: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_OLEDBERROR. The execution history may show “The component "OLE DB Source" (1) failed the pre‑execute phase”. | SSIS-835
Why the number 835?
In the SSIS source code the ACE provider error path was given the internal identifier 835 when the product team logged it. It never became a public “error number” likeDTS_E_OLEDBERROR(0xC0202009), but the community started referring to the whole symptom as SSIS‑835. The moniker stuck. Midway through, the initial power dynamic (one character
The SSIS-835 error can arise from a variety of issues within SSIS packages. Systematic troubleshooting and a thorough understanding of package configurations and environments are key to resolving these errors efficiently. Why the number 835
A concise, actionable report on CVE-2023-XXXX / SSIS-835 (assumed: remote code execution vulnerability in Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services) including impact, root cause, detection, mitigation, and recommended remediation steps.
Based on the identified cause, perform the necessary corrections: